Carbon dating dinosaur


The authors provided another reason why this soft tissue is from a more ancient source than modern fungus.They found that the ratio of radioactive carbon (C-14) to non-radioactive carbon (C-12) was less than five percent of that found in living organisms.Non-mineralized collagen protein that is millions of years old defies scientific explanation.And a carbon-date age of thousands of years equally contrasts with the standard evolutionary interpretation that the fossil record represents millions of years of earth history.If the source of the carbon was mosasaur tissue (and this is the most straightforward explanation), then the mosasaur's carbon date would be in line with an age of thousands of years, as inferred by the integrity of its soft tissue.



Careful chemical analyses published in peer-reviewed journals concluded that original tissues—most often protein that had not mineralized—came from the buried animals' carcasses.Was the DNA that they sequenced actually from the mosasaur?If so, this would certainly help falsify the millions-of-years interpretation of the age of these remains.Since the concept of 70 million-year-old flesh sounds so fanciful, many evolutionists have suggested that biological material in fossils came from bacteria instead of being original tissue.